Investigation of Developed Shield Composition to Neutron Shielding in Treatment Room for BNCT to Reduce Clinical Effects

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: One of the best radiotherapy methods that have been suggested for the treatment of cancers such as brain, head and neck, skin, and recently liver is boron neutron capture therapy. Therefore, neutron shielding in the treatment room is important because the absorption of neutrons in the shield may lead to the production of gamma rays, which can have destructive effects. While an increase in density of the elements used in the shield is generally sufficient for gamma radiation shielding, protection against neutrons is more complicated. It is due to variations in neutron interactions with the matter based on their kinetic energy and reaction cross-sections with the shield component atoms.
Methods: In this paper, it will be developed a neutron shield that is a proper shield against ionizing radiation, will be accomplished via the use of experiment-based optimization of materials backed by Monte Carlo simulations. Also, the neutron shielding characteristics of conventional and heavy-weight shields modified with epoxy resin and gadolinium oxide were investigated. The shielding effectiveness against neutrons was initially modeled using the MCNP code. In the end, the comparison of MCNP simulated results and the real experiment was presented.
Results: Gadolinium is an efficient additive for weakening low-energy neutrons, but it does not have a good effect in terms of shielding against fast neutrons. Also, Epoxy resin improves the shielding property of the composite against neutron radiation.
Conclusion: The results show that the addition of the polymers used in composite shielding and the proposed method for developing the neutron shield can improve the shielding characteristics for neutron beams.

Keywords


1. Yasui L, Kroc T, Gladden S, Andorf C, Bux S, Hosmane N. Boron neutron capture in prostate cancer cells. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2012;70(1):6-12. Doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.07.001 2. Chen AY, Liu YW, Sheu RJ. Radiation shielding evaluation of the BNCT treatment room at THOR: A TORT-coupled MCNP Monte Carlo simulation study. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2008;66(3):28-38. Doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.07.016 3. Lotfi O, Sadrmomtazi A, Nikbin IM. A comprehensive study on the effect of water to cement ratio on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of heavyweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2019;229 (1):116905. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116905 4. Roslan MKA, Ismail M, Kueh ABH, Zin MRM. High-density concrete: exploring Ferro boron effects in neutron and gamma radiation shielding. Construction and Building Materials. 2019;215(4):718-725. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.105 5. Tefelski DA, Piotrowski T, Polański A, Skubalski J, Blideanu V. Monte-Carlo aided design of neutron shielding concretes. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. 2013;61(1):161-71. Doi: 10.2478/bpasts-2013-0015. 6. Abdullah MAH, Rashid RSM, Amran M, Hejazii F, Azreen NM, Fediuk R, Voo YL, Vatin NI, Idris MI. Recent Trends in Advanced Radiation Shielding Concrete for Construction of Facilities: Materials and Properties. Polymers. 2022;14(14):2830. Doi: 10.3390/polym14142830 7. Morioka A, Sato S, Kinno M, Sakasai A, Hori J, Ochiai K, Yamauchi M, Nishitani T, Kaminaga A, Masaki K, Sakurai S. Irradiation and penetration tests of boron-doped low activation concrete using 2.45 and 14 MeV neutron sources. Journal of nuclear materials. 2004;329(2):1619-23. Doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.143. 8. Okuno K, Kawai M, Yamada H. Development of novel neutron shielding concrete. Nuclear Technology. 2009;168(2):545-52. Doi: 10.13182/NT09-A9241. 9. Thomas BS, Yang J, Bahurudeen A, Abdalla JA, Hawileh RA, Hamada HM, Nazar S, Jittin V, Ashish DK. Sugarcane bagasse ash as supplementary cementitious material in concrete–A review. Materials Today Sustainability. 2021;15(1):100086. Doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100086 10. Dąbrowski M, Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka D, Bogusz K, Glinicki MA. Influence of serpentinite aggregate on the microstructure and durability of radiation shielding concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2022;337(5):127536. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127536 11. Piotrowski T, Tefelski D, Polański A, Skubalski J. Monte Carlo simulations for optimization of neutron shielding concrete. Open Engineering. 2012;2(2):296-303. Doi: 10.2478/s13531-011-0063-0 12. Gallego E, Lorente A, Vega-Carrillo HR. Testing of a high-density concrete as neutron shielding material. Nuclear technology. 2009;168(2):399-404. Doi: 10.13182/NT09-A9216 13. Harvey ZR. Neutron flux and energy characterization of a plutonium-beryllium isotopic neutron source by Monte Carlo simulation with verification by neutron activation analysis. UNLV Theses. 2010. Doi:10.34917/2242920 14. Piotrowski T, Tefelski D, Polański A, Skubalski J. Monte Carlo simulations for optimization of neutron shielding concrete. Open Engineering. 2012;2(2):296-303. Doi: 10.2478/s13531-011-0063-0 15. Akkurt I, Altindag R, Gunoglu KA, Sarıkaya H. Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete including marble aggregates. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2012;43(2):56-60. Doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.031 16. Akkurt I, Akyıldırım H. Radiation transmission of concrete including pumice for 662, 1173 and 1332 keV gamma rays. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2012;252(1):163-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.008