Validation and Localization of the Persian Version of Short form the Index of Ability and Readiness of Performing the Mission in Military Nurses

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 School of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Trauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, School of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Nursing is an important subset of the health care system to act in critical situations. Military and civilian nurses are among the first to appear on the scene and provide services in the event of an accident or disaster, and military nurses play a double role in times of crisis due to their special security dimension. Assessing the capability and readiness of military nurses requires a local, accurate and reliable tool. The aim of this study was to validate and localize the short form tool of the Ability and Readiness Index in military nurses in Iran.
Methods: This research is a descriptive methodological study. In this study, permission was first obtained from the original author to use the tool. Then the Readiness Estimate and Deploy Ability Index (READI) short-form tool was translated into Persian according to the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) protocol. Face validity of this tool was performed using the opinions of Persian literature experts and 15 military nurses. Then, with the help of 10 experts in the field of instrumentation, the content validity of the tool was calculated quantitatively, and based on the announced opinions, the content validity index (CVI) and was determined. Reliability was assessed by two methods of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest, by calculating the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data analysis was performed using confirmatory factor analysis with a sample size of 200 military nurses by convenience sampling method available with SPSS-22 and Lisrel 8.8.
Results: In the present study, the CVI in all items, were higher than the standard value (0.62) and (0.79), respectively and all the items got the desired score. Also, the final version of the 40-item READI short-form tool with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.949 and the intra-cluster correlation index for the whole tool had 0.92 reliability. The results of factor analysis of data showed that the Persian version of the tool has a 6-factor structure (clinical nursing readiness, operational nursing readiness, life skills, psychosocial readiness, command and administrative support, group identification, and solidarity). Based on the mentioned factors, the sum of items was explained. These factors were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. (RAMSEA=0.067, CFI=0.97 and IFI=0.97). Estimation of standard factor loads in confirmatory factor analysis showed that this tool has an acceptable fit in Iranian culture and has good structural validity.
Conclusion: According to the acceptable level of validity and reliability indicators, the Persian version of the READI short form can be used as a comprehensive and reliable native tool to measure the level of readiness of military nurses.

Keywords


1. Zhang Z, Wang F, Song M. The cell repair research of spinal cord injury: a review of cell transplantation to treat spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurorestoratology. 2019;7(2):6. 2. Ma H, Chihava TN, Fu J, Zhang S, Lei L, Tan J, et al. Competencies of military nurse managers: A scoping review and unifying framework. Journal of Nursing Management. 2020;28(6):1166-76. 3. Ebadi A, Heidaranlu E. Virtual learning: A new experience in the shadow of coronavirus disease. Shiraz E Medical Journal. 2020;21(12):1-2. 4. Royal P, Smith M. A UK Military nurse practitioner on Exercise SAIF SAREEA 3: the first Overseas deployment. BMJ Mil Health. 2020;166(6):425-8. 5. Esmail Heidaranlu B, Ebadi A, Ardalan A, Khankeh H. A scrutiny of tools used for assessment of hospital disaster preparedness in Iran. American journal of disaster medicine. 2015;10(4):325-38. 6. Reineck CA. The Readiness Estimate and Deployability Index: a self-assessment tool for emergency center RNs in preparation for disaster care. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal. 2004;26(4):349-56. 7. StAmand I. US Public Health Service Nurse Officers Working in Disaster Settings. 2019. 8. Mitani S, Kuboyama K, Shirakawa T. Nursing in sudden-onset disasters: factors and information that affect participation. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2003;18(4):359-65. 9. Al-Hunaishi W, Hoe VC, Chinna K. Factors associated with healthcare workers willingness to participate in disasters: A cross-sectional study in Sana’a, Yemen. BMJ open. 2019;9(10):e030547. 10. Tavan A, Tafti AD, Nekoie-Moghadam M, Ehrampoush M, Nasab MRV, Tavangar H, et al. Risks threatening the health of people participating in mass gatherings: A systematic review. Journal of education and health promotion. 2019;8. 11. Heidaranlu E, Habibi F, Moradi A, Lotfian L. Determining Functional Preparedness of Selected Military Hospitals in Response to Disasters. Trauma Monthly. 2020;25(6):249-53. 12. Tzeng W-C, Feng H-P, Cheng W-T, Lin C-H, Chiang L-C, Pai L, et al. Readiness of hospital nurses for disaster responses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. Nurse education today. 2016;47:37-42. 13. Reineck C, Finstuen K, Connelly LM, Murdock P. Army nurse readiness instrument: psychometric evaluation and field administration. Military medicine. 2001;166(11):931-9. 14. Wilmoth MC, De Scisciolo S, Gilchrest LJ, Dmochowski J. The readiness estimate and deployability index and psychometric properties in army reserve nurses and medics. Military medicine. 2007;172(8):800-5. 15. Jamaili M, Hasavari F, Jokar F, Kazemnezhad Leili E. Assessing the Disaster Readiness of Nurses in Hospitals. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery. 2020;30(2):120-7. 16. Maeda T, Kotera S, Matsuda N, Edwards GD. Disaster readiness among nurses in Japan: Current status following the Great East Japan earthquake. International Journal of Nursing. 2016;3(1):15-28. 17. Ramezani SN. Validation and localization of the form of ability and readiness of the mission in nurses. Master Thesis, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University. 2018:110-25. 18. Davarani ER, Tavan A, Amiri H, Sahebi A. Response capability of hospitals to an incident caused by mass gatherings in southeast Iran. Injury. 2022. 19. Meretoja R, Isoaho H, Leino‐Kilpi H. Nurse competence scale: development and psychometric testing. Journal of advanced nursing. 2004;47(2):124-33. 20. Gunawan J, Aungsuroch Y, Fisher ML, McDaniel AM. Development and psychometric properties of managerial competence scale for first-line nurse managers in Indonesia. SAGE open nursing. 2019;5:2377960819831468. 21. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. Journal of rafsanjan university of medical sciences. 2015;13(12):1153-70. 22. Laksmita OD, Chung M-H, Liao Y-M, Chang P-C. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Indonesian adolescent disaster survivors: A psychometric evaluation. PLoS one. 2020;15(3):e0229958. 23. Nainian M, Nik Azin A, Shairi M, Rajabi M, Soltaninejad Z. Reliability and Validity of Adultsâ Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI-A). Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020;15(1):189-99. 24. Alshehri B. Emergency nurses’ preparedness for disaster in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2017;7(3):101-14. 25. Nakhaei M, Bakhshi Giv R, Sharifzadeh G. Effectiveness of training nurses on the National Program for Hospital Preparedness in improving their preparedness for accidents and disasters. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2021;28(1):61-9. 26. Sato H, Techasrivichien T, Omori A, Ono-Kihara M, Kihara M. Psychosocial consequences among nurses in the affected area of the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 and the Fukushima complex disaster: A qualitative Study. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2019;13(3):519-26. 27. Kosaka S, Tanaka M, Sakai T, Tomikawa S, Yoshida K, Chikaraishi T, et al. Development of self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients, including management of post-transplantation chronic kidney disease. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013;2013. 28. Polit DF, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: a primer for the health professions: Wolters Kluwer Philadelphia, PA; 2016. 29. Yahia A, Guermazi M, Khmekhem M, Ghroubi S, Ayedi K, Elleuch M. Translation into Arabic and validation of the ASES index in assessment of shoulder disabilities. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2011;54(2):59-72. 30. Balasoupramanien K, Comat G, Renard A, Meusnier J-G, Montigon C, Pitel A-S, et al. Nurse-performed ultrasonography in combat operations: a perspective for the future? 2021.