Identification and Application of Need Assessment Criteria and Prioritization of Environmental Health Projects in Military Centers Based on Weighing Matrix and Field Evaluation

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Health Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study aimed to identify criteria affecting the prioritization of environmental health projects in military centers and to propose a prioritization strategy.
Methods: In this descriptive study, by reviewing and summarizing the theoretical frameworks, the criteria for assessing and prioritizing environmental health projects were identified. Next, by presenting the general content of the questionnaire to experts, their constructive opinions were applied. After designing the assessment checklist, which included 16 criteria, relevant sub-criteria were also designed for each criterion. Scores 1, 2, and 3 were assigned to the criteria, and the sub-criteria were scored from 1 to 10. A weighted score was obtained by multiplying the weight of criteria by their scores. The weighted score was obtained by multiplying the score by its weight. After summing all the weighted scores, the total score of each center was obtained. In a center with a higher overall score, the implementation of environmental health plans had a higher priority. Finally, a field evaluation was performed.
Results: According to the total scores, environmental health projects had the highest priority in center D and center F, respectively.
Conclusion: The method proposed in this study, by considering the opinions of experts and converting qualitative criteria into quantitative ones, can be a helpful guide for health planners and other decision-makers and officials to make logical decisions. It is recommended to appoint a specialized committee to prioritize environmental health projects.

Keywords


منابع 1. Rahmani R, Mehrvarz S, Zareei Zavaraki E, Abbaspour A, Maleki H. Military medicine's role in the armed forces and the need to develop specialized education programs in Iran military medicine. Journal of military medicine. 2012;13(4):247-52. [In Persian] 2. Saffari M SH R-jH. Personal Hygiene and its Determinants among Military Forces. The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht. 2015; 13(6): 57-71. [In Persian] 3. Drew CH, Bonnefoy X, Van Duivenboden J. Guidelines for evaluation of environmental health services: WHO Regional Office Europe; 2000. 4. Bahrami R, Noori K. Perceptual analysis-Spatial development indicators of health services in Kurdistan. Geographic Thought. 2018;9(17):119-37. [In Persian] 5. Pawlewicz K, Senetra A, Gwiaździńska-Goraj M, Krupickaitė D. Differences in the environmental, social and economic development of Polish–Lithuanian trans-border regions. Social indicators research. 2020;147(3):1015-38. doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02179-9 6. Malekafzali H, Bahreini F, Alaedini F, Forouzan A. Health system priorities based on needs assessment & stakeholders’ participation in IR Iran. Hakim Research Journal. 2007;10(1):13-7. [In Persian] 7. Diaby V, Campbell K, Goeree R. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a bibliometric analysis. Operations Research for Health Care. 2013;2(1-2):20-4. doi.org/10.1016/ j.orhc.2013.03.001 8. Jahangiri A. Ranking of consumption management strategies in drinking water distribution networks by using multiple attribute decision making. Journal of water and wastewater science and engineering. 2019;4(2):17-26. [In Persian] doi:10.22112/jwwse.2019.159573.1125 9. Mosavi Bafroei S, Amrollahi M, Eslami H. Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Selecting the Most Appropriate Method for Wastewater Treatment in Meybod Villages in Yazd, 2018: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2019;18(8):783-96. [In Persian] 10. Asgarian Najafabadi SA, Ghassemzadeh HR. Prioritization of waste disposal methods using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;18(3):407-14. [In Persian] 11. Termeh SVR, Vahid S. Cutaneous leishmaniasis susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria decision-making techniques analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP). Journal of Research in Environmental Health. 2018;3(4):275-86. [In Persian] 12. Khodadadi S, Hemmati M. Site Selection and Prioritizing the Subsurface Dam Construction Axis Using Decision Support System (DSS),(Case Study: Daryan and Heris Catchments). Hydrogeology. 2018;3(1):47-59. [In Persian] doi:10.22034/HYDRO.2018.6176 13. Sheykhali M, Asadollahfardi G, Emamzadeh SS. Identification and Prioritization of the Criteria and Indicators of the Urban Water System by AHP and RAMCAP. Modares Civil Engineering journal. 2020;20(4):121-33. [In Persian] 14. Wei C, Wei J, Kong Q, Fan D, Qiu G, Feng C, et al. Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process. Science of the total environment. 2020;742:140400. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400 15. Mara D. Low-cost sewerage: John Wiley London; 1996. 16. Wichapa N, Khokhajaikiat P. Solving multi-objective facility location problem using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and goal programming: a case study on infectious waste disposal centers. Operations Research Perspectives. 2017;4:39-48. doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2017.03. 002 17. Hadipour A, Rajaee T, Hadipour V, Seidirad S. Multi-criteria decision-making model for wastewater reuse application: a case study from Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(30):13857-64. doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1060905 18. Modibbo UM, Heman ED, Hafisu R. Multi-criteria decision analysis for malaria control strategies using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Yola North Local Government Area, Adamawa State Nigeria. Amity Journal of Computational Sciences. 2019;3(2):43-50. 19. Ng V, Sargeant J. Prioritizing zoonotic diseases: differences in perspectives between human and animal health professionals in North America. Zoonoses and public health. 2016;63(3):196-211. doi.org/10.1111/zph.12220 20. Van Thac D, Dang WV. Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries: The entropy weight and VIKOR methods. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. 2019;36(1):119-30. 21. Baratchi M, Mansouri N, Ahmadi A. An Evaluation of Health Hazards Based on Multi Criteria Decision Making Process. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health. 2019;13(4):1-9. [In Persian] 22. Mirshafiee A, Darvish M. Degradation of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from aqueous solution by coupled electrocoagulation process with persulfate salt. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2021;19(1):1035-41. doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00668-z 23. Aydiner C, Sen U, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Dogan EC. Hierarchical prioritization of innovative treatment systems for sustainable dairy wastewater management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;112:4605-4617. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.107 24. Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V. Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environmental modelling & software. 2011;26(10):1211-24. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04. 002 25. Khansefid R, Abrishamchi A. Study on Selection Criteria of Unconventional Sanitary Sewer Networks in Small communities (Case Study: Bandar Taheri of Boushehr Province). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2014;16(4):111-24. [In Persian] 26. Razmkhah N, Nabi BGR, Azimi A, Esmaili K. Priority evaluation of iran's rural areas with respect to their need of wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2007;9(34):53-60. 27. Khosravi Mashizi A, Sharafatmandrad M. Prioritization of rainfall storage methods for rangeland improvement and management of Jiroft Plain using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal.2019;8(22):15-26.[In Persian] doi: 10.22052/deej.2018.7.22.1