Fire Pathology in a Military Hospital Using the FRAME Technique

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

2 Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

4 Military Health Research Center, Lifestyle Research Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Hospitals are One of the vital and sensitive places as well as practical that maintaining their function in normal conditions and in times of crisis is one of the biggest concerns of health system managers. By using the principles of fire safety, hospitals' vulnerability can be reduced. Fire is one of the risks that can lead to many human and financial losses as well as disruption of hospital performance. Fire risk assessment is a more effective way to assess the vulnerability, capacity and capability of the hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of fire in one of the hospitals in Tehran to analyze the vulnerability of these uses.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed by using the Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineers (FRAME) in the hospital building of a military hospital. Fire risk was calculated using the formulas of the mentioned method in EXCEL software. Factors influencing the level of risk obtained were identified and evaluated.
Results: The level of fire risk for residents in all units was higher than one. Level factor, fire load factor and normal protection factor were identified as effective factors that result in the existing fire risk level.
Conclusion: The numerical value of the risk for the residents was at an unfavorable level. The results of this study showed that the use of FRAME method in assessing the risk of health facilities such as hospitals, by determining the strengths and weaknesses of the assessed locations, the possibility of identifying effective factors to predict and prevent accidents and maintain the performance of these centers at times. Be sensitive to such man-made or natural emergencies.

Keywords


.12 Hooper P, Sukhram R, Blackman B, Dear J. On the blast resistance of laminated glass. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2012;49(6):899-918. .14 Kobes M, Helsloot I, De Vries B, Post JG. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Safety Journal. 2010;45(1):1-11. .15 Hirschler MM. Fire hazard and fire risk assessment: ASTM International; 1992. .20 Lu S, Mei P, Wang J, Zhang H. Fatality and influence factors in high-casualty fires: A correspondence analysis. Safety science. 2012;50(4):1019-33. .21 Charters D, editor Quantified assessment of hospital fire risks. Proc Interflam; 1996. .23 Cyganik KA. Disaster preparedness in virginia hospital center-arlington after Sept 11, 2001. Disaster Management & Response. 2003;1(3):80-6. .28 Jönsson R, Lundin J. The Swedish Case Study, Different Fire Safety Design Methods Applied on a High Rise Building. LUTVDG/TVBB—3099--SE. 1998;3099. .29 BM AS. Industrial safety principles and Services. Fanavaran press. 2005:P 339. .30 Guo S, editor Fire Risk Assessment for Commercial Buildings Based on FRAME Method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2019: IOP Publishing. .33 De Smet E. Handbook for the use of this Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineering. Tweede uitgave; 2000. .35 Book FCE. Avilable From: http://www. FRAMEmethod. net. Accessed; 2009. .36 Šakėnaitė J. A comparison of methods used for fire safety evaluation. Mokslas–Lietuvos ateitis/Science–Future of Lithuania. 2010;2(6):36-42. .37 Ng M. Fire Risk Analysis Of The Airport Terminals. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes. 2003;5(4):103-7.