Assessing the Risk of COVID-19 in High-risk Personnel of the Police Forces Using Rapid Risk Analysis Technique

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Health Services Management, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Given the rapid spread of COVID-19 disease around the world, determining the risk of disease in the workplace is one of the essential factors to improve management of this infectious disease. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the risk of COVID-19 disease in high-risk personnel of the police forces using rapid risk analysis technique.
Methods: This study was a descriptive, analytical, and cross-sectional study conducted in Winter 2021 in Tehran. Participants were 474 police officers randomly selected from three different sub-groups including »P < span dir="RTL">« police, »R« police and »A« police (shown as «پ», «ر» and «آ» in Farsi manuscript, respectively). A rapid risk analysis technique was used to collect data. The data collection tool was a questionnaire based on the mentioned technique, which includes three components of disease probability, severity (consequence), and level of health belief. Adjustments and responses were scored based on the Likert scale. Then, the scores obtained from estimating the three components were multiplied and the result represented the final risk index for COVID-19. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 24 and using the mentioned technique. In this study, Analysis of Variance and Bonferroni post hoc test with a significance level of 0.05 was used.
Results: The risk index score of more than 95% of »P < span dir="RTL">« police officers and more than 88% of »R« police officers and more than 93% of »A« police officers were above 40(unacceptable). The minimum (4.86) and maximum (890.62) risk index was related to »R« police. Based on univariate analysis of variance, there was no significant difference between the risk of COVID-19 disease in the three occupational groups (F=0.13 and p-value=0.87). Comparing the level of three components effective in estimating the risk index, there was no significant difference between the components of the level of disease probability and level of health belief in the three occupational groups, however, there was a significant difference in the level of severity (consequence) component of all three groups. In addition, 47.2% »P < span dir="RTL">« police, 45.7% »R« police, and 35.5% »A« police group were suspected to be sick.
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, all three occupational groups were at risk for COVID-19 disease. Therefore, in order to control the COVID-19 epidemic, employers must implement infection control strategies based on accurate and technical assessment of the risk of disease in order to prevent the occurrence of disease and consequently reduce lost working days by performing appropriate, timely, and low-cost control activities.

Keywords


Reference: 1- Fathi A, Jafari Kandovan Gh. Comparison of lifestyle, quality of life and mental health in two military dependent and non- military dependent university personnel. J Mil Med. 2011; 13(1):17-24. ]Link[ 2- Sadeghi Chime A.Global Crises and the Future of international Order؛Infectious disease with emphasis on corona. International Security Monthly.2019; N: 14. 3- Ali Gol M, Roshani Z. How to prevent corona from spreading in the workplace. 2020; Payapey(48):153-145. 4-Gee Jim. Mobilizing the honest majority to fight health-sector fraud. Bull Word Health ORGAN 2009; 87:254-25.]Link[ 5- Doustdar R. The role of armed forces in realization of sustained security with regard to the vision 1404 case study: police forces of the i. R. Iran. J quarterly of order and security gurds.2011; 4(3):81-106.]Link[ 6- Alisheri GH, Mohebi H.A, Ahmadzadasl M. Assesment of health condition in Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (SEPAH) personnel in Tehran. J Mil Med.2005;7(2):131-139.]Link[ 7- Jafari Golestan N, Jafari A, Rahimi A. Importance of health in the Militaries: A review study.J School of Army Nursing.2019;18(2). ]Link[ 8- Mohammadfam I, Mahdinia M, Salimi V, Koupal R, Soltanzadeh A.Assessing the Risk of COVID-19 in Workplace Environments Using Rapid Risk Analysis. J Mil Med.2020; 22(6): 607-615.]Link[ 9- Flowchart for diagnosis and treatment of inpatient care at the level of inpatient and outpatient services. A set of health guidelines for controlling the covid-19 disease epidemic. Seventh edition.2020. 10- Mohammadfam I, Mirzaei Aliabadi M. Developing a Method for Assassing and Managing tee Risk of Covid-19; Rapid Covid-19 Hazard analysis. Iran Occupational Health.2020 ;(20 Dec) ;Special Issue:Covid-19.]Link[ 11- Marei M. Jobstress and coping with in the Military.QJMST.2009;6(14):93-110. 12. Pueyo T. Coronavirus: Why you must act now.Politicians, community leaders and business leaders: what should you do and when. 2020 Mar12. 13- Naderi E, Seif Naraghi M. Ravesh-haye Tahghigh va Chegounegi Arzeshyabi Oloum Ensani Research Methods and How to Evaluate it in Humanities [Link] 14- Wang LS, Wang YR, Ye DW, Liu QQ. A Review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) based on current evidence. Int j Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 105948. [Link] 15- Lat CC, Liu YH, Wang CH, Hsueh SC,Yen MY, et al. Asymptomaitic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COY-2): Facts and mytths. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020; 5.(3):404-12. [Link] 16- Ganji A, Mosayebi Gh, Khaki M, Ghazavi A. A Review on Immunopathogenesis, Molecular Biology and Clinical Aspects of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences. 2020؛23(1)8-21. [Link] 17- Grassi A, Gamberini R, Mora C, Rimini B. A fuzzy multiattribute model for risk evaluation in workplaces. Safety Science. 2009;47(5):707-16. [Link] 18- Bea RG. Human and organizational factors in reliability assessment and management of offshore structures. Risk Analysis.2002;22(1):29-45. [Link] .