Assessing the Risk of COVID-19 in Workplace Environments using Rapid Risk Analysis

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Department of Occupational Safety & Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: One of the most important measures in the field of occupational health management in work environments is to evaluate the risk of diseases with the aim of providing preventive and reducing solutions to the risk of diseases and disorders in the workplace. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 in high-risk occupational environments using the rapid risk analysis technique.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2020 in three high risk workplaces including 5 banks, 4 post centers and 2 hospitals in the city of Hamadan, Iran. The tools used in this study included a rapid risk analysis technique. In this semi quantitative technique, the risk level is calculated based on three components: disease probability, severity (consequence), and level of health belief.
Results: The findings showed that the risk level of COVID-19 is high for all studied subjects. The lowest and highest risk of COVID-19 in bank employees was estimated at 200 and 300, respectively. The lowest and highest risk of covid-19 in the hospital wards were 50 and 100, respectively. In addition, the low and high risk of covid-19 in the four postal centers were evaluated 50 and 150, respectively (unacceptable risk>40).
Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the rapid risk analysis technique for COVID-19 can be considered as a suitable technique for screening in the workplace. Due to the high risk of infection in the study workplaces, it is recommended to provide appropriate protection and health measures to prevent the disease in these workplaces.

Keywords

References

1. Farnoosh G, Ghanei M, Khorramdelazad H, Alishiri G, Shahriary A, Hosseini Zijoud SR. Are Iranian Sulfur mustard-exposed survivors more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: some similarity in their pathogenesis. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2020:1-12. doi:10.1017/dmp.2020.156 2. Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, Zaki R, Tan Z, Bibi S, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? International journal of epidemiology. 2020. doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa033 3. Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19). Statpearls [internet]: StatPearls Publishing; 2020. 4. Samadipour E, Ghardashi F. Factors Influencing Iranians' Risk Perception of Covid-19. Journal of Military Medicine. 2020;22(2):122-9. Doi:10.30491/JMM.22.2.122 5. Mohammadfam I, Sajedi A, Mahmoudi S, Mohammadfam F. Application of Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) in evaluation of health, safety and environmental (HSE) hazards. International Journal of occupational hygiene. 2012;4(2):17-20. 6. Zarei E, Azadeh A, Khakzad N, Aliabadi MM, Mohammadfam I. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. Journal of hazardous materials. 2017;321:830-40. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074 7. Soltanzadeh A, Heidari Hr, Mahdinia M, Mohammadi H, Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadfam I. Path analysis of occupational injuries based on the structural equation modeling approach: a retrospective study in the construction industry. Iran Occupational Health. 2019;16(3):47-57. 8. Meskarpour-Amiri M, Shams L, Nasiri T. Identifying and Categorizing the Dimensions of Iran's Health System Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Military Medicine. 2020;22(2):108-14. doi:10.30491/JMM.22.2.108 9. Spinazzè A, Cattaneo A, Cavallo DM. COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: protecting worker health and the response of the Italian Industrial Hygienists Association. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. 2020. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxaa044 10. Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Khaledi-Paveh B, Salari N, Mohammadi M, Sabbaghchi M. Geographic Information System (GIS): A Reliable Tool for Monitoring COVID-19 in Iran and the World. Journal of Military Medicine. 2020;22(2):216-20. doi:10.30491/JMM.22.2.216 11. Burdorf A, Porru F, Rugulies R. The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic: consequences for occupational health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2020;46(3):229-30. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3893 12. Ministry of health and medical education. Flowchart of Diagnosis and Treatment of Covid-19 at the outpatient and inpatient service levels. 2020. 13. Prevention CfDCa. People Who Are at Higher Risk for Severe Illness. 2020. 14. Organization IL. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. 3rd Edition. 2020. 15. Organization WH. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020. 16. Semple S, Cherrie JW. COVID-19: protecting worker health. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. 2020. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxaa033 17. Koh D. Occupational risks for COVID-19 infection. Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England). 2020;70(1):3. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa036 18. Ashrafi-rizi H, Kazaempour Z. The Challenges of Information Service related to the COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Military Medicine. 2020;22(2):207-9. doi:10.30491/JMM.22.2.207 19. Kang L, Li Y, Hu S, Chen M, Yang C, Yang BX, et al. The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):e14. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X 20. Kim KW, Park SJ, Lim HS, Cho HH. Safety climate and occupational stress according to occupational accidents experience and employment type in shipbuilding industry of korea. Safety and health at work. 2017;8(3):290-5. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.08.002
Journal of Military Medicine
Volume 22, Issue 6 - Serial Number 91
July and August 2020
Pages 607-615

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics