Living in Home Quarantine: Analyzing Psychological Experiences of College Students during Covid-19 pandemic

Document Type : Original Research

Author

Department of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: The Covid-2019 is a pneumonia that onset on December 31, 2019 in Wuhan, China, and then swept the world. Following the disease in Iran, people began a new life in quarantine to be safe. Quarantine life is accompanied by psychological, social and economic consequences, and its implementation requires the support, supervision and adherence of the country's medical staff. This phenomenological study was conducted to analyze college students' psychological experiences in home quarantine.
Methods: This is qualitative research with an interpretive phenomenological approach. Purposeful sampling was done in Tehran, Iran in 2020. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Participants in this study were postgraduate students with a natural experience of living in quarantine. Research data reached a theoretical saturation with 15 interviews. All data were recorded and handwritten and analyzed using the "Van Manen Phenomenology" approach.
Results: Data analysis included four main themes, "developing negative emotions, confusion and pessimism", "developing obsessive-compulsive behavior about body and washing", "concerns about family health", "economic and social concerns, fear of tomorrow getting rid of the virus”.
Conclusion: The students' experiences of living in quarantine were very unique. Understanding the complexities of their experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about living in quarantine can provide comprehensive plans for decision-makers, health care professionals, and mental health professionals.

Keywords


1. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. The Lancet. 2020. 2. Abachizadeh A. Review of Future Trends of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic Based on Developed Forecasting Models in the World. Salamat Ijtimai (Community Health). 2020; 7(2):221-230. 3. World health Organizations, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report–65. 25 March. 2020. 4. Farnoosh G, Alishiri G, Hosseini Zijoud S R, Dorostkar R, Jalali Farahani A. Understanding the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Based on Available Evidence - A Narrative Review. J Mil Med. 2020; 22 (1) :1-11. 5. Alimohamadi Y, Sepandi M. Basic Reproduction Number: An important Indicator for the Future of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Iran. J Mil Med. 2020; 22(1): 96-97. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quarantine and isolation. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/index.html (accessed Jan 30, 2020). 7. Aghaei M H, Ebadi A, Aliakbari F, Vafadar Z. The Effectiveness of Crisis Management Education Based on Inter-Professional Approach on Military Nurses’ Ability to Confront with Crisis. J Mil Med. 2020; 22 (1):54-63. 8. Kim Y. Nurses' experiences of care for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus in South Korea. American journal of infection control. 2018;46(7):781-7. 9. Liu C, Wang H, Zhou L, Xie H, Yang H, Yu Y, et al. Sources and symptoms of stress among nurses in the first Chinese anti-Ebola medical team during the Sierra Leone aid mission: A qualitative study. International journal of nursing sciences. 2019;6(2): 187-91. 10. Cava MA, Fay KE, Beanlands HJ, McCay EA, Wignall R. The experience of quarantine for individuals affected by SARS in Toronto. Public Health Nursing. 2005;22(5):398-406. 11. Lin EC, Peng YC, Tsai JC. Lessons learned from the anti-SARS quarantine experience in a hospital-based fever screening station in Taiwan. American journal of infection control. 2010;38(4):302-7 12. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Rubin GJ. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020. 13. Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International journal of nursing studies. 2007;44(1): 131-42. 14. Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge; 2016. 15. Van Manen M. Writing qualitatively, or the demands of writing. Qualitative health research. 2006; 16(5):713-22. 16. Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A, Najmi-Sadegh S. Living with veteran fathers: analyzing the psychological and emotional needs in daughters of veterans (A phenomenological study). J Mil Med. 2019; 21(5):479-489. 17. Heinonen K. van Manen’s method and reduction in a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Nurse researcher. 2015;22(4). 18. Cope DG. Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. In Oncology nursing forum 2014;41(1):89-91. 19. Wester M, Giesecke J. Ebola and healthcare worker stigma. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2019;47(2):99-104. 20. Wilken JA, Pordell P, Goode B, Jarteh R, Miller Z, Saygar BG, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among members of households actively monitored or quarantined to prevent transmission of Ebola Virus Disease—Margibi County, Liberia: February-March 2015. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2017;32(6):673-8. 21. Caleo G, Duncombe J, Jephcott F, Lokuge K, Mills C, Looijen E, et al. The factors affecting household transmission dynamics and community compliance with Ebola control measures: a mixed-methods study in a rural village in Sierra Leone. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):248. 22. Desclaux A, Badji D, Ndione AG, Sow K. Accepted monitoring or endured quarantine? Ebola contacts' perceptions in Senegal. Social Science & Medicine. 2017;178:38-45. 23. Mihashi M, Otsubo Y, Yinjuan X, Nagatomi K, Hoshiko M, Ishitake T. Predictive factors of psychological disorder development during recovery following SARS outbreak. Health Psychol. 2009; 28: 91-100.