Marine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R.Iran
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three methods of patience, stress and telecommunication issues in military job satisfaction.
Methods: The study followed an experimental method with a pretest-posttest design. The tools used during this study was the Job Descriptive Index questionnaire.
Results: The results showed that all the three methods of increasing job satisfaction were effective in this study. The average of job satisfaction had the highest increase in the patience exercise, telecommunication and externalized stress groups respectively.
Conclusion: According to the efficacy of each three methods, defusing, patience practice and telecommunication on increasing job satisfaction, using each of these three manners is possible for increasing job satisfaction. In addition, as patience practice had the best efficacy, this method may be used as the most effective method compared to the two others.
Eskandari, M., Ahmadi, K., Fathi Ashtiyani, A., Azadfallah, P., & Palizgir, Z. (2022). Comparing the Effectiveness of Defusing, Patience Practice and Telecommunication on Job Satisfaction among Military Staff. Journal of Military Medicine, 18(1), 331-338.
MLA
Mohsen Eskandari; Khodabakhsh Ahmadi; Ali Fathi Ashtiyani; Parviz Azadfallah; Zohreh Palizgir. "Comparing the Effectiveness of Defusing, Patience Practice and Telecommunication on Job Satisfaction among Military Staff". Journal of Military Medicine, 18, 1, 2022, 331-338.
HARVARD
Eskandari, M., Ahmadi, K., Fathi Ashtiyani, A., Azadfallah, P., Palizgir, Z. (2022). 'Comparing the Effectiveness of Defusing, Patience Practice and Telecommunication on Job Satisfaction among Military Staff', Journal of Military Medicine, 18(1), pp. 331-338.
VANCOUVER
Eskandari, M., Ahmadi, K., Fathi Ashtiyani, A., Azadfallah, P., Palizgir, Z. Comparing the Effectiveness of Defusing, Patience Practice and Telecommunication on Job Satisfaction among Military Staff. Journal of Military Medicine, 2022; 18(1): 331-338.
)