شناسایی ژنتیکی بقایای پیکر شهدا در جنگ امریکا و اسرائیل بر علیه ایران؛ روش های علمی و عملی موثر

نوع مقاله : مروری

نویسندگان

مرکز تحقیقات ژنتیک انسانی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بقیه الله (عج)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

جنگ‌ها و حوادث گسترده با تلفات انسانی بالا، فرایند شناسایی بقایای قربانیان را با چالش‌های فنی، زمانی و انسانی مواجه می‌کنند. این مقاله با تمرکز بر تجربیات حاصل از جنگ‌های تحمیلی اخیر در ایران، به بررسی راهکارهای علمی و عملی موثر در تسریع و افزایش دقت در تعیین هویت پیکر شهدا می‌پردازد. در این راستا، نقش مدیریت صحیح صحنه حادثه، جمع‌آوری نظام‌مند نمونه‌ها بر اساس استانداردهای بین‌المللی، و اهمیت داده‌های پیش از مرگ و نمونه‌های مرجع خانوادگی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. همچنین ظرفیت بافت‌های مختلف انسانی در استخراج و بازیابی اطلاعات ژنتیکی و کاربرد روش های نوین مولکولی در فرایند تشخیص هویت مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. در سال‌های اخیر در ایران نیز با توسعه زیرساخت‌های تخصصی شناسایی ژنتیکی، از جمله فعالیت‌های انجام‌شده و تلاش شده روند شناسایی بقایای شهدا با دقت و سرعت بیشتر و پاسخگویی مؤثرتری به خانواده‌های قربانیان اینگونه حوادث صورت گیرد. در مجموع، به‌کارگیری رویکردهای علمی همراه با رعایت ملاحظات اخلاقی و انسانی می‌تواند نقش مهمی در بهبود فرایند شناسایی و کاهش ابهام برای بازماندگان ایفا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization, International Committee of the Red Cross. Management of dead bodies after disasters: a field manual for first responders. Washington DC.: Pan American Health Organization; 2006.
  2. INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification guide. Lyon France.: International Criminal Police Organization; 2018.
  3. Otterbein KF. How war began. College Station TX.: Texas A&M University Press; 2004.
  4. Al-Tameemi R. Reading the cultural specificities of the Iraqi Marsh Arabs from their landscape. Salt Lake City UT.: Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture; 2016.
  5. Ramsbotham O, Woodhouse T, Miall H. Contemporary conflict resolution. 4th ed. Cambridge UK.: Polity Press; 2016.
  6. Akbariqomi M, Abolghasemi H, Mehrvarz S. The Critical Healthcare Situation in Gaza Following the Israeli Bombings. Journal of Military Medicine. 2023;25(5):1983-5. doi:10.30491/jmm.2024.10012 29
  7. Akbariqomi M, Khatami SM, Mehrvarz S‎. Gaza is the Scene of the Massacre of Children. International Journal of Travel Medicine and Global Health. 2023;11(4):435-6. doi:10.30491/ijtmgh.2023.4261 15.1390
  8. Akbariqomi M, Abolghasemi H, Heidari R, Khoshi A, Farnoosh G. Israel's Attack on Iran's Scientific and Academic Community: A Reflection of Scientific Apartheid. Journal of Military Medicine. 2025;27(Special Issue 1):29-36. doi:10.30491/jmm. 2025.1006954.1406
  9. Akbariqomi M, Abolghasemi H, Farnoosh G. Targeted Assaults on Iran's Scientific Capacities: A Legacy for Global Science. Trauma Monthly. 2025; 30(4):1502-3. doi:10.30491/tm.2025.546726.1877
  10. Akbariqomi M, Abolghasemi H, Farnoosh G. The Shajareh Tayyebeh Elementary School Crime: Lessons from Infanticide and Scientific Terrorism by the United States and Israel. Journal of Military Medicine. 2026;28(Special Issue 1). doi:10.30491/ jmm.2026.1007081.1494
  11. Watherston J, McNevin D, Gahan ME, Bruce D, Ward J. Current and emerging tools for the recovery of genetic information from post mortem samples: New directions for disaster victim identification. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2018;37: 270-82. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.016
  12. Forrest A. Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances. Forensic Sciences Research. 2019;4(4):316-30. doi:10.1080/209617 90.2019.1678710
  13. Jethi N, Arora KS. Forensic endodontics and national identity programs in India. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2020;31(4):662-5. doi:10.4103/ ijdr.IJDR_631_18
  14. International Commission on Missing Persons. DNA identification of missing persons. Sarajevo: ICMP; 2014.
  15. Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R. Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;56:S23-8. doi:10.1111/ j.1556-4029.2010.01602.x
  16. Williams R, Wienroth M. Identity, mass fatality and forensic genetics. New Genetics and Society. 2014;33(3):257-76. doi:10.1080/14636778.2014.94 6005
  17. Caenazzo L, Tozzo P, Rodriguez D. Ethical issues in DNA identification of human biological material from mass disasters. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2013;28(4):393-6. doi:10.1017/S10490 23X1300040X
  18. Vaswani V, Caenazzo L, Congram D. Corpse identification in mass disasters and other violence: the ethical challenges of a humanitarian approach. Forensic Sciences Research. 2024;9(1):owad048. doi:10.1093/fsr/owae010
  19. Dyregrov K. Micro-sociological analysis of social support following traumatic bereavement: Unhelpful and avoidant responses from the community. Omega-Journal of Death and Dying. 2004;48(1):23-44. doi:10.2190/T3NM-VFBK-68R0-UJ60
  20. Turner S, Littlemore J, Taylor J, Parr E, Topping AE. Metaphors that shape parents’ perceptions of effective communication with healthcare practitioners following child death: a qualitative UK study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e054991. doi:10.11 36/bmjopen-2021-054991
  21. Budowle B, Sajantila A. Revisiting informed consent in forensic genomics in light of current technologies and the times. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2023;137(2):551-65. doi:10.10 07/s00414-023-02947-w
  22. Huss MT. Forensic psychology: research, clinical practice, and applications. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
  23. Meilia PD, Freeman MD, Herkutanto, Zeegers MP. A review of the diversity in taxonomy, definitions, scope, and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2018;14(4):460-8. doi:10.1007/s12024-018-0031-6
  24. Gutiérrez-Hurtado IA, García-Acéves ME, Puga-Carrillo Y, Guardado-Estrada M, Becerra-Loaiza DS, Carrillo-Rodríguez VD, et al. Past, present and future perspectives of forensic genetics. Biomolecules. 2025;155:713. doi:10.3390/biom15 050713
  25. Helm K, Matzenauer C, Neuhuber F, Monticelli F, Meyer H, Pittner S, et al. Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2021;135(4):1319-27. doi:10.1007/s004 14-021-02601-3
  26. Kim GE, Jung EB, Lee SE, Lee DY, Kim H, Kim MY. Forensic DNA Extraction from Decomposed Human Soft Tissues: Optimization Using Ethanol Treatment and Surfactant-Based Lysis Conditions. Forensic Science International. 2026:112961. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112961
  27. Sato Y, Motani H, Inoue H, Hayakawa M, Yajima D, Nagasawa S, et al. Multiplex STR typing of aortic tissues from unidentified cadavers. Legal Medicine. 2009;11:S455-7. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.02. 064
  28. Sato Y, Hayakawa M, Nakajima T, Motani H, Kiuchi M. HLA typing of aortic tissues from unidentified bodies using hot start polymerase chain reaction–sequence specific primers. Legal Medicine. 2003;5:S191-3. doi:10.1016/S1344-6223(02)00108-6
  29. Ferreira ST, Paula KA, Nogueira RF, Oliveira ES, Moraes AV. A comparative study between muscle, cartilage and swab from inside the urinary bladder samples for DNA typing of severely burnt bodies in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2015;5:e617-8. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.243
  30. Goodwin WH. The use of forensic DNA analysis in humanitarian forensic action: The development of a set of international standards. Forensic Science International. 2017;278:221-7. doi:10.1016/j. forsciint.2017.07.017
  31. Gonzalez A, Cannet C, Zvénigorosky V, Geraut A, Koch G, Delabarde T, Ludes B, Raul JS, Keyser C. The petrous bone: Ideal substrate in legal medicine?. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2020; 47:102305. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102305
  32. Parker C, Rohrlach AB, Friederich S, Nagel S, Meyer M, Krause J, et al. A systematic investigation of human DNA preservation in medieval skeletons. Scientific Reports. 2020;101:1-16. doi:10.1038/s41 598-020-68645-0
  33. Hansen HB, Damgaard PB, Margaryan A, Stenderup J, Lynnerup N, Willerslev E, et al. Comparing ancient DNA preservation in petrous bone and tooth cementum. PloS One. 2017;12(1):e0170940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170940
  34. Hines DZ, Vennemeyer M, Amory S, Huel RL, Hanson I, Katzmarzyk C, et al. Prioritized sampling of bone and teeth for DNA analysis in commingled cases. In Commingled human remains. Academic Press. 2014. pp. 275-305. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-405889-7.00011-8
  35. Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR, Morling N, Parsons TJ, Sajantila A, et al. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2007;1(1):3-12. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003
  36. Edson SM, Ross JP, Coble MD, Parsons TJ, Barritt SM. Naming the dead—confronting the realities of rapid identification of degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Science Review. 2004;16:63-90.
  37. Miloš A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L, Huel RL, Katzmarzyk C, Rizvić A, et al. Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croatian Medical Journal. 2007;48(4):486-93.
  38. Pinhasi R, Fernandes D, Sirak K, Novak M, Connell S, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, et al. Optimal ancient DNA yields from the inner ear part of the human petrous bone. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0129102. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129102
  39. Inkret J, Zupanič Pajnič I. Bone type selection for human molecular genetic identification of skeletal remains. Genes. 2025;16(8):872. doi:10.3390/ genes16080872
  40. Mundorff AZ, Bartelink EJ, Mar‐Cash E. DNA preservation in skeletal elements from the World Trade Center disaster: recommendations for mass fatality management. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2009;54(4):739-45. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009. 01045.x
  41. Rai B, Kaur J. Evidence-based forensic dentistry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
  42. Mohammed F, Fairozekhan AT, Bhat S, Menezes RG. Forensic odontology. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island FL.: StatPearls Publishing; 2024 updated 2023 Aug 14. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984
  43. Mohd Sabri NE, Sheikh Abdul Kadir SH, Chainchel Singh MK, Heo CC, Khoo LS, Mohd Yusof MY, ET AL. Disaster victim identification: the co-utilisation of applied biosystems RapidHIT ID system and DJI Matrice 300 drone for onsite DNA analysis. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):4872. doi:10.1038/ s41598-025-88750-6
  44. Geserick G, Wirth I. Genetic kinship investigation from blood groups to DNA markers. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 2012;39(3):163-75. doi:10.1159/000338850
  45. Budowle B, Moretti TR, Niezgoda SJ, Brown BL. CODIS and PCR-based short tandem repeat loci: law enforcement tools. In: Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Human Identification; 1998; Innsbruck, Austria. Madison WI.: Promega Corporation; 1998. pp. 73-88.
  46. Stanley UN, Khadija AM, Bukola AT, Precious IO, Davidson EA. Forensic DNA profiling: autosomal short tandem repeat as a prominent marker in crime investigation. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;27(4):22-35. doi:10.21315/mjms 2020.27.4.3
  47. Gettings KB, Tillmar A, Sturk‐Andreaggi K, Marshall C. Review of SNP assays for disaster victim identification: Cost, time, and performance information for decision‐makers. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2024;69(5):1546-57. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.15492
  48. Sobrino B, Brión M, Carracedo A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Science International. 2005;154(2-3):181-94. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.020
  49. Budowle B, van Daal A. Forensically relevant SNP classes. Biotechniques. 2008;445:603-10. doi:10.21 44/000112809
  50. Fondevila M, Pereira R, Gusmão L, Phillips C, Lareu MV, Carracedo A, et al. Forensic performance of insertion–deletion marker systems. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2011;3(1):e443-4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.09.083
  51. Bruijns B, Tiggelaar R, Gardeniers H. Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: A review. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(21):2642-54. doi:10.1002/elps.201800082
  52. Estrella CS, Lumayna MP, Sagum MD, Sosing MV, Calacal GC, De Ungria MC, et al. Challenges in using massively parallel sequencing technology for forensic DNA analysis in Southeast Asia. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2025;11:100638. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100638
  53. International Commission on Missing Persons. Disaster victim identification DVI. Internet. The Hague: ICMP; cited 2026 May 29. Available from: https://icmp.int/what-we-do/science-and-technology/disaster-victim-identification-dvi
  54. Interpol. I-Familia: identifying missing persons globally through family DNA matching Internet. 2021. Available from: https://missingpersons.icrc. org/library/i-familia-identifying-missing-persons-globally-through-family-dna-matching
  55. Watherston J, Watson J, Bruce D, Ward J, McNevin D. Efficient DNA profiling protocols for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sciences. 2021;1(3): 148-70. doi:10.3390/forensicsci1030014
  56. Rosser Jr JC, Vignesh V, Terwilliger BA, Parker BC. Surgical and medical applications of drones: A comprehensive review. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2018;22(3):e2018-00018. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2018.00018
  57. Daud SM, Yusof MY, Heo CC, Khoo LS, Singh MK, Mahmood MS, et al. Applications of drone in disaster management: A scoping review. Science & Justice. 2022;62(1):30-42.
  58. Alonso A, Martín P, Albarrán C, Garcí P, De Simón LF, Iturralde MJ, et al. Challenges of DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. Croatian Medical Journal. 2005;46(4):540.
  59. Bakhach J. The cryopreservation of composite tissues: Principles and recent advancement on cryopreservation of different type of tissues. Organogenesis. 2009;5(3):119-26. doi:10.4161/org. 5.3.9583
  60. Caputo M, Bosio LA, Corach D. Long-term room temperature preservation of corpse soft tissue: an approach for tissue sample storage. Investigative Genetics. 2011;2(1):17. doi:10.1186/2041-2223-2-17
  61. Graham EA, Turk EE, Rutty GN. Room temperature DNA preservation of soft tissue for rapid DNA extraction: an addition to the disaster victim identification investigators toolkit?. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2008;2(1):29-34. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.07.003
  62. Miao L, Kang K, Zhang C, Liu S, Jiao R, Yuan L, et al. Sequence features of forensic core short tandem repeat loci. Hereditas (Beijing). 2025;47(11):1214-30. doi:10.16288/j.yczz.25-021
  63. Tao RY, Dong XY, Chen AQ, Lü YH, Zhang SH, Li CT. Application Progress of Massively Parallel Sequencing Technology in STR Genetic Marker Detection. Fa yi xue za zhi. 2022;38(2):267-79.
  64. Hernández Bustos A, Martiny E, Bom Pedersen N, Parvathaneni RP, Hansen J, Ji HP, et al. Short Tandem Repeat DNA Profiling Using Perylene-Oligonucleotide Fluorescence Assay. Analytical Chemistry. 2023;95(20):7872-9. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00063
طب نظامی
دوره 28، ویژه نامه شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 141
جنگ تحمیلی 40 روزه
مرداد و شهریور 1405
صفحه 59-71

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار