1. AndVan De Sande D, Van Genderen ME, Huiskens J, Gommers D, Van Bommel J. Moving from bytes to bedside: a systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine. 2021;47(7):750-60. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06446-7
2. Jacobson AF, Hamilton P, Galloway J. Obtaining and evaluating data sets for secondary analysis in nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1993;15(4):483-94. doi:10.1177/01939 4599301500407
3. O’Connor S. Secondary data analysis in nursing research: a contemporary discussion. Clinical Nursing Research. 2020;29(5):279-84. doi:10.1177/ 1054773820927144
4. Tate JA, Happ MB. Qualitative secondary analysis: a case exemplar. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2018;32(3):308-12. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.09.007
5. Beck CT. The value of secondary analysis for qualitative inquiry. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2023;52(6):421-4. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2023.08.005
6. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4(1):5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-006 4-8
7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.11 36/bmj.n71
8. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Jbi; 2020.
9. Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for information. 2018;34(4):285-91. doi:10.3233/EFI-180221
10. Dhami A, Onyeukwu KA, Sattar S, Batra A, Mostafa Y, Haris M, et al. The prognostic performance of artificial intelligence and machine learning models for mortality prediction in intensive care units: a systematic review. Cureus. 2025;17(8):e90465. doi:10.7759/cureus.90465
11. Rong R, Gu Z, Lai H, Nelson TL, Keller T, Walker C, et al. A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records. JAMIA Open. 2025;8(2):ooaf026. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf026
12. Swinckels L, Bennis FC, Ziesemer KA, Scheerman JF, Bijwaard H, de Keijzer A, et al. The use of deep learning and machine learning on longitudinal electronic health records for the early detection and prevention of diseases: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26:e48320. doi:10.2196/48320
13. Prada-Ramallal G, Takkouche B, Figueiras A. Bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies using secondary health care databases: a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1):53. doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0695-y
14. Gierend K, Waltemath D, Ganslandt T, Siegel F. Traceable research data sharing in a German medical data integration center with FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability)-geared provenance implementation: proof-of-concept study. JMIR Formative Research. 2023;7: e50027. doi:10.2196/50027
15. Rojas JC, Lyons PG, Chhikara K, Chaudhari V, Bhavani SV, Nour M, et al. A Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit data Format (CLIF) to enable multi-institutional federated critical illness research. medRxiv. 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.09.04.24313058
16. Baldwin JR, Pingault JB, Schoeler T, Sallis HM, Munafò MR. Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2022;37(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00839-0
17. Thibault RT, Kovacs M, Hardwicke TE, Sarafoglou A, Ioannidis JP, Munafò MR. Reducing bias in secondary data analysis via an Explore and Confirm Analysis Workflow (ECAW): a proposal and survey of observational researchers. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(10):230568. doi:10.1098/rsos.2 30568
)